Falls in the Last 30 Days in Long-Term Care

This indicator provides the percentage of long-term care residents who fell in the last 30 days.

Lower is better. It means that a lower percentage of long-term care residents had a fall in the month leading up to their quarterly assessment.

Data updated:
Data availability: to (fiscal years)
Geographic coverage
Newfoundland and Labrador, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia, Yukon
Reporting level
Province/Territory, Region, Facility, Corporation
Calculation

This indicator examines the percentage of residents who fell in the 30 days leading up to the date of their quarterly clinical assessment. It is calculated by dividing the number of residents who had a fall in those 30 days by the number of all residents with valid assessments within the applicable time period.

Unit of Analysis: Resident

Denominator

Residents with valid assessments

Numerator

Residents who had a fall in the last 30 days recorded on their target assessment (RAI-MDS 2.0: J4a = 1; interRAI LTCF: J1a = 1, 2)

The CCRS eReports provide authorized users with secure and timely access to key clinical administrative information from the Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS). The reports are available to organizations submitting data to CCRS, their health authorities and ministries of health, and are updated on a quarterly basis.

Log in to CCRS eReports

The Integrated interRAI Reporting System Long-Term Care (IRRS LTC) Secure Reporting tool aggregates pan-Canadian long-term care data from LTC homes. Authorized users can explore organization-level data, compare results with peers within and across jurisdictions and see trends over time.

Log in to IRRS LTC Secure Reporting

Download CSV Expand/collapse all All accordions expanded

Name

Falls in the Last 30 Days in Long-Term Care

Short/Other Names

Percentage of Residents Who Fell in the Last 30 Days (FAL02)

Description

This indicator looks at how many long-term care residents fell in the 30 days leading up to the date of their quarterly clinical assessment. Falls are the leading cause of injury for seniors and contribute to a significant burden on the health care system. Residents are at a higher risk of falling if they have a history of falls or are taking certain medications. Preventing falls increases the safety and quality of care of residents.

Rationale

Long-term care quality indicators were developed by interRAI, an international research network, to provide organizations with measures of quality across key domains, including physical and cognitive function, safety and quality of life. Each indicator is adjusted for resident characteristics that are related to the outcome and independent of quality of care. The indicators can be used by quality leaders to drive continuous improvement efforts. They are also used to communicate with key stakeholders through report cards and accountability agreements.

Interpretation

Lower is better. It means that a lower percentage of long-term care residents had a fall in the month leading up to their quarterly assessment.

HSP Framework Dimension

Safe

Areas of Need

Living With Illness, Disability or Reduced Function

Targets/Benchmarks

CIHI: None

Health Quality Ontario (external): 9% for long-term care

Available Data Years

to

Geographic Coverage

  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • New Brunswick
  • Nova Scotia
  • Ontario
  • Manitoba
  • Saskatchewan
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Yukon

Reporting Level/Disaggregation

  • Province/Territory
  • Region
  • Facility
  • Corporation
  • Sector (residential and hospital-based continuing care)

Indicator Results

Web Tool:
Your Health System: In Depth
PDF:
Accessing Indicator Results on Your Health System: In Depth (PDF)

Web Tool:
Quick Stats

Web Tool:
CCRS eReports (RAI-MDS 2.0) via My Services (log in)

Web Tool:
IRRS LTC Secure Reporting tool via My Services (log in)

Update Frequency

Monthly (IRRS LTC Secure Reporting tool)

Quarterly (CCRS eReports)

Annually (Quick Stats)

Annually (Your Health System)

The Latest Results update date refers to the latest results publicly available. More recent results are available in the secure reporting tools (CCRS eReports and IRRS – LTC Secure Reporting).

Latest Results Update Date

Updates

Not applicable

Description

This indicator examines the percentage of residents who fell in the 30 days leading up to the date of their quarterly clinical assessment. It is calculated by dividing the number of residents who had a fall in those 30 days by the number of all residents with valid assessments within the applicable time period.

Unit of Analysis: Resident

Type of Measurement

Percentage or proportion

Denominator

Description:

Residents with valid assessments

Inclusions:

  1. Residents with valid assessments. To be considered valid, the target assessment must
    1. Be the latest assessment in the quarter
    2. Be carried out more than 92 days after the Admission Date
    3. Not be an Admission Full Assessment (RAI-MDS 2.0) or First Assessment  (interRAI LTCF)

Exclusions:

None

Numerator

Description:

Residents who had a fall in the last 30 days recorded on their target assessment (RAI-MDS 2.0: J4a = 1; interRAI LTCF: J1a = 1, 2)

Inclusions:

  1. Residents with valid assessments. To be considered valid, the target assessment must
    1. Be the latest assessment in the quarter
    2. Be carried out more than 92 days after the Admission Date
    3. Not be an Admission Full Assessment (RAI-MDS 2.0) or First Assessment (interRAI LTCF)

Exclusions:

None

Method of Adjustment

Stratification, direct standardization, indirect standardization

Standard Population:
3,000 facilities in 6 U.S. states and 92 residential care facilities and continuing care hospitals in Ontario and Nova Scotia

Adjustment Applied

Covariates used in risk adjustment:

Individual covariates: Not totally dependent in transferring; locomotion problem; Personal Severity Index subset 2 (non-diagnoses); any wandering; unsteady gait/cognitive impairment; age younger than 65

Facility-level stratification: Case Mix Index (CMI)

Geographic Assignment

Place of service

Data Sources

Caveats and Limitations

This measure uses data collected by long-term care facilities using the Resident Assessment Instrument–Minimum Data Set 2.0 (RAI-MDS 2.0) and submitted to the Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS) or using the interRAI Long-Term Care Facilities (interRAI LTCF) assessment and submitted to the Integrated interRAI Reporting System (IRRS). 

Certain provinces and territories have transitioned to or are in the process of transitioning to the newer interRAI LTCF assessment instrument (see Trending Issues for more information). For a number of years, the national average will be based on both assessment instruments. To support inclusion of interRAI LTCF assessment data in public reporting, CIHI has completed an analysis to understand similarities and differences between the 2 assessment instruments. Overall, indicator results are comparable and appropriate to be trended over time and across instruments. Performance allocations and top results for 3 indicators (Restraint Use, Worsened Pressure Ulcers and Worsened Depressive Mood) are currently not provided for jurisdictions that are using the interRAI LTCF. Preliminary analysis suggests that there may be differences between results for these indicators based on the assessment instrument used, which may affect performance allocations. More data is required to draw firm conclusions, as these differences may also be related to other factors (e.g., improvements in education and coding practices) or to a real change in the measure of quality.

Trending Issues

The number of long-term care homes and jurisdictions submitting data to CIHI varies over time and has been generally increasing. Furthermore, as long-term care homes transition from the RAI-MDS 2.0 to the interRAI LTCF, there may be changes in data coverage that can impact the results (see more details below). Time series changes must be interpreted carefully, particularly when comparing the national average over time and when comparing provincial/territorial averages over the transition to the new assessment instrument. Please note that indicator results are risk-adjusted to control for population differences (factors that are beyond the facility’s control but can affect resident outcomes) to enable more appropriate and fair comparisons of the actual quality of care. Please refer to the CCRS Quality Indicators Risk Adjustment Methodology in the References section for more information.

Use of interRAI LTCF: As jurisdictions transition to/adopt the interRAI LTCF, there may be disruptions or delays in data submission to CIHI, which can impact the coverage of data and therefore indicator results. A summary of interRAI LTCF transition/adoption by jurisdiction is provided below for reference:

  • Nova Scotia started the transition in 2022; the transition is ongoing. Results for Nova Scotia for the transition year are excluded from public reporting due to low coverage in CCRS and lack of a full year of data for most facilities in IRRS. 
  • New Brunswick completed adoption between 2016 and 2017 and started submitting data to IRRS in 2019. 
  • Saskatchewan completed the transition in 2019 and 2020 and started submitting data to IRRS in 2020.
  • Alberta started the transition in 2021; the transition is ongoing. Currently, only data from the RAI-MDS 2.0 (CCRS) is submitted to CIHI and included in reporting.

CIHI recognizes that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected many long-term care homes across Canada, including their ability to complete assessments and/or submit data to CIHI. Available data may vary by jurisdiction and facility. Results should be interpreted in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comments

The long-term care quality indicators use 4 rolling quarters of data for calculations in order to have a sufficient number of assessments for risk adjustment. Since residents are assessed on a quarterly basis, each resident can contribute to the indicator up to 4 times.

General criteria for public reporting of long-term care indictors in Your Health System are as follows:

  • A minimum of 30 assessments are required for the denominator; otherwise, the result is suppressed as it may not be stable. 
  • At the facility level,
    • Results for a newly submitting facility are excluded if it did not submit assessments for the first quarter of the latest year of reporting.
    • Results for a facility that closed in the latest fiscal year of reporting are excluded.
    • Results for facilities undergoing a reorganization (split, merger, etc.) are suppressed for the fiscal year(s) prior to and encompassing the reorganization. 
    • Results for a facility where more than 50% of residents are younger than 65 are excluded.
    • Results for a facility that transitioned to the interRAI LTCF midway through the fiscal year are excluded for that year.
  • At aggregate levels (including health region and province/territory), results are reported based on coverage. Coverage is measured as the percentage of facilities (within the respective health region or province/territory) that submitted data out of all facilities that were expected to submit data for the latest fiscal year of reporting.
    • Coverage is considered complete at 95% or more.
    • Coverage is considered incomplete at less than 95% and results are flagged as being based on partial coverage. 
    • Results are suppressed if coverage is 60% or less.
       

Data for this indicator is also available in the Quick Stats product Profile of Residents in Residential and Hospital-Based Continuing Care, which includes province-/territory-level results for both the residential and hospital-based continuing care sectors. Please consult the Quick Stats product for more information.

References

Canadian Institute for Health Information. CCRS Quality Indicators Risk Adjustment Methodology (PDF). 2013.

Health Quality Ontario. Long-Term Care Benchmarking Resource Guide (PDF). 2013.

Health Quality Ontario. Results From Health Quality Ontario's Benchmark Setting for Long-Term Care Indicators (PDF). 2017.

Health Quality Ontario. Health Quality Ontario Indicator Library. Accessed October 4, 2017.

Hirdes JP, Mitchell L, Maxwell CJ, White N. Beyond the "iron lungs of gerontology": Using evidence to shape the future of nursing homes in Canada. Canadian Journal on Aging. 2011.

Hirdes JP, Poss JW, Caldarelli H, et al. An evaluation of data quality in Canada's Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): Secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2013.

Jones RN, Hirdes JP, Poss JW, et al. Adjustment of nursing home quality indicators. BMC Health Services Research. 2010.

If you have a disability and would like CIHI information in a different format, visit our Accessibility page.