|
|
|
|
More Than Half of Emergency Department Visits Classified as “Less-Urgent” or “Non-Urgent”Latest hospital data show half of emergency department patients see a doctor within an hour—but many are waiting longer
September 14, 2005—More than half (57%) of patient visits to selected Canadian emergency departments in 2003–2004 were for less-urgent or non-urgent conditions, according to a new report released today by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Only 0.5% of patients were considered most severely ill—meaning they needed life-saving interventions. Understanding Emergency Department Wait Times: Who Is Using Emergency Departments and How Long Are They Waiting?, 2005 is the first of three reports focusing on selected Canadian emergency departments, with the bulk of the data provided by Ontario hospitals, but also including participating hospitals in Nova Scotia, British Columbia and Prince Edward Island. “If we are to understand emergency department wait times in Canada, we must first understand how emergency departments are used,” says Jennifer Zelmer, CIHI Vice-President of Research and Analysis. “This study shows that more than half of the visits to emergency departments are for the less-urgent and non-urgent conditions. Where alternatives are available, this raises questions about whether a portion of these types of patients can be appropriately treated in non-emergency department settings, such as primary health care clinics.”
As well, Canadians appear to use emergency departments more than people in a number of other countries. According to a 2004 international survey, nearly 4 in 10 Canadians (38%) reported having been to an emergency department in the previous two years, compared to 34% of those surveyed in the United States and approximately 30% of those surveyed in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Overall, Canadians make over 14 million visits each year to emergency departments across the country, a number that has remained relatively stable for four years. Half of All Patients Who Visited Emergency Departments Waited Less Than An Hour To Be Seen By An Emergency PhysicianAccording to records from participating hospitals, half of all emergency department patients were seen by a physician in 51 minutes or less. However, 10% waited 10 minutes or less, and another 10% waited nearly three hours or more. In a 2004 international survey, nearly half of Canadians polled (48%) said they waited two or more hours to see a doctor on their last visit to an emergency department, while only 36% of those surveyed in the UK, 34% in the U.S., 29% in Australia and 27% of those in New Zealand reported having to wait that long. Time spent waiting to see a physician varied by the severity of the patient’s condition. Those patients considered the most urgent waited the shortest time on average, with half seeing a doctor within five minutes. On the other hand, 10% of the most severely ill patients waited 45 minutes or more. These cases could include conditions such as major trauma, shock or severe respiratory distress, while non-urgent and less-urgent cases could include conditions such as sore throats, diarrhea or chronic back pain. Patients tended to wait longer to be seen by a doctor in higher-volume emergency departments. For example, in community hospitals with more than 30,000 emergency visits per year, the median wait to see a doctor ranged between 6 and 70 minutes, depending on the severity of the patient’s condition, while in emergency departments with less than 15,000 visits per year, the range in median wait times ranged from 1 to 25 minutes. Median wait times are the point at which half spent less than this amount of time waiting and half spent more. The study also looked at the length of a patient’s emergency department visit. Nearly half of those who went to an emergency department completed their visit in two hours or less, with 10% of patients finishing in 36 minutes or less, but 10% spending more than six hours in the emergency department. The proportion of patients that spent less than four hours in emergency departments was similar in Canada (76%) and the U.S. (72%). In the UK, however, almost all patients spent less than four hours in the emergency department, following the implementation of a national program intended to shorten emergency department visits. Rural Areas More Likely To Use Emergency Departments For Non-EmergenciesThe data also show that there are distinct differences in the way urban and rural populations use their hospital emergency departments. When looking at the newly established health regions in Ontario, those regions that serve rural areas reported a higher proportion of non-urgent cases seeking treatment at an emergency department. For example, 5% of the emergency department visits in Toronto-Central (urban) were triaged as non-urgent, while 16% of visits in North Simcoe Muskoka (rural) fell into this category. While these data are mainly from Ontario, a Statistics Canada survey shows that Canadians use emergency departments at about the same rate in most provinces for specific health issues like injuries. Across the country, 13% said their most recent contact with a health care professional or their treatment for their most recent injury had been in an emergency department. Only the Yukon Territory and New Brunswick had significantly higher rates, with 19% and 18%, respectively. Nunavut had the lowest rate, at 10%. “There is a great deal more to be learned about how our emergency departments are used and how long people wait for treatment,” says Kira Leeb, CIHI Manager, Health Services Research. “This report is just a beginning, and we hope it will help inform future decisions on how to improve access to the right care at the right time. Other key highlights in the report:
Canadian Institute for Health InformationThe Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) is an independent, pan-Canadian, not-for-profit organization working to improve the health of Canadians and the health care system by providing quality health information. CIHI’s mandate, as established by Canada’s health ministers, is to coordinate the development and maintenance of a common approach to health information for Canada. To this end, CIHI is responsible for providing accurate and timely information that is needed to establish sound health policies, manage the Canadian health system effectively and create public awareness of factors affecting good health. Figures and TablesReport
Media ContactsJill Oviatt Leona Hollingsworth |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
|
Page last updated September 14, 2005 |